Thursday, October 31, 2013
Our weapon and our armour in the Spiritual Life
"Taking up the cross as a weapon and clothed with faith as a breastplate, O all glorious Andrew, thou wentest forth to wrestle with visible and invisible enemies, a self-called Martyr, and thou didst cast down their arrays by the might of the Spirit. Since thou art abundantly filled therewith, O righteous Father, grant even unto me a small portion of grace, that it may enlighten my mind to praise thy courageous struggles worthily, O light of the orthodox Faith."
I. Our weapon in the spiritual life is the cross. What does this mean in practical terms? It means that we need to embrace mortification as an essential part of our life. Our share in the cross is twofold. First, we participate in the cross passively, by accepting all of the mortifications that come to us through the Providence of God. We keep in mind that everything that happens to us is either positively or permissively willed by God, and that, in either case, He has only one motive for all the things that He wills-- His compassion for all His creatures. Whatever suffering we have to endure, if we embrace it in the spirit in which it is given, as a share in the sufferings of Christ to encourage our growth, then we are in a position to profit from it. It is only when we resist it through anger, sadness, etc., that we miss our opportunity to grow closer to God and destroy our passions. Further, we also participate in the mystery of the cross as our weapon actively by seeking mortification that we can embrace intentionally and voluntarily. We might, for example, commit ourselves to special prayers, or fasting, or some other penance for the same reasons as a means to greater communion with God and the destruction of our passions. We need to go out to battle both with our weapon (the cross) and our armour, the breastplate that is the faith. We need to have an abundance of faith, because we cannot make sense of the mortifications that God sends us without faith. It is only with the eyes of faith that we can understand, even in the limited way that we human beings are capable of, the workings of God in our lives. Whatever we choose to do for ourselves, the penances that God sends to us through His loving Providence are by far more important. We should praise God and thank Him for the opportunity He gives us to use the cross as a weapon for these two purposes. We should resolve to practice some special mortification, and to always and seamlessly whatever God sends us in the way of suffering.
II. We should remember that our battle is against both visible and invisible enemies. Our visible enemies are whats rather than who's. Our visible enemies are the material circumstances that are ancillary to temptation, things like advertising, television programmes, music and specific aspects of the behaviour of others. All of these things are visible, but they are not the temptations themselves. They are ancillary to the temptations. A number of theologians have argued persuasively that the beat itself of popular music aids in arousing certain passions-- a fact that in Christian thinking is always problematic, since Christian anthropology regards the passions as demon-controlled. Added to the visible enemies, we also have invisible enemies: the temptations themselves and the demons who inspire them. Our battle is against both of them. It is against them that we wear our armour and use our weapon. God is our strength and defense against visible and invisible enemies, and we should concretely resolve to firmly commit our will to resist both temptations to sin and the material circumstances that help them.
III. The arrays of our enemies are cast down by the Spirit. Well, wait. I thought we said that the cross (that is mortification in communion with Christ) and faith (trust in God that He knows what He is doing in sending us particular mortifications) are the way that we defeat our temptations both visible and invisible. No, the cross and faith are the ways that we fight against them. We are required to fight against them, but the way that we fight against them is not the way that they are defeated. They are defeated by the Spirit. Our efforts are required as a sign of our bona fides, but they do not, in themselves, accomplish the victory. The victory comes through the Spirit, Who, in filling us, becomes our Spirit too. We receive a share of the Spirit in proportion to our ability to receive Him, and it is His portion that accomplishes victory over sin in us through the enlightenment of our minds. We can thank God and praise Him abundantly, reaching out to Him in renewed love, for finding us worthy of a portion, and an ever-increasing portion, of His Spirit. We should make a firm resolution to renew and expand our particular devotion to God's Holy Spirit. Think of specific ways that an increasing portion of the Holy Spirit can assist you in the circumstances of the interior life.
The Tree is Known by its Fruit, and a House by its Foundation
Why do you call me, "Lord, Lord," and yet don't do what I tell you? Anyone who comes to me and listens to my words and obeys them-- I will show what he is like. He is like a man who, in building his house, dug deep and laid the foundation on rock. the river flooded over and hit that house but could not shake it, because it was well built. But anyone who hears my words and does not obey them is like a man who built his house without laying a foundation; when the flood hit that house it fell at once--and what a terrible crash that was!"(Luke 6: 43-9)
I. The Lord Jesus' reference in the Gospel of St. Luke concerning the image of the tree, reminds us at once of all the many other times that the Lord uses this same image throughout the wholeness of salvation history. It is one of God's favourite images. We think, for example, first of the Garden, and the trees that are in the Garden, which are good for food and delightful to the eyes, and especially of the Tree of Life in the middle of the Garden. Yet, even after the human race lost access through sin to the Tree of Life, human beings were still expected to be like life-giving trees, living to the greatest extent possible in communion with God. In the first psalm, for example, we read: "Blessed is the man, who has not walked in the counsel of the wicked... He shall be like a tree planted by flowing waters, which will give its fruit in due season. Its leaf shall not wither, and in everything he does, he prospers." Similarly, in Psalm 92, we read that "the just man shall flourish like the palm tree, and he shall grow like a cedar in Lebanon. They who are planted in the house of the Lord shall flourish in the courts of our God." In the forgoing verse, communion with the Lord is highlighted by the reference to the "courts of our God." If we were to read the passage from St. Luke without this background in the rest of the Scriptures, we would perhaps think that, according to the Lord's saying, the good and the bad are unchanging quantities, and that the bad are irreformable. It certainly sounds that way. But understanding the passage as a fulfillment of what is said in the Psalms and in the rest of the Tradition, guides us to see that being good or bad rests in a decision, and then, in a habit of decisions. Communion with God begins with the decision to turn to God, but that communion is deepened by habitual decisions to draw closer to God through grace. The passage speaks about "the treasure of the heart," and that this treasure can be either good or bad. A treasure is not heaped up in a day. Of course, God can give us a treasure all at once, and instantly, for God can do anything. Yet, is such a thing really consistent with God's designs. How is our growth really humanly possible without repeated synergistic decisions to draw ever closer to God. OK, so what does "synergistic decisions" mean? Well, it means that our cooperation with grace is a synergy. It is like electricity. If the electrical current did not flow out from the wall to the lamp, the lamp would not be lit. At the same time, however, if the electrical current did not flow from the lamp back to the wall, the lamp would not be lit. When the circuit is complete, where does the current begin, and where does it end? Where is the important part of the current? Is it that that comes from the wall, or is it that that goes back from the lamp to the wall? Christianity, in the past, has allowed itself to become embroiled in chicken and egg controversies regarding this very question, but these controversies have obscured the truth more than they have revealed it. We receive God's energy (grace), but we have to cooperate with that energy by means of a corresponding synergy. Is our synergy, in fact, the energy of God simply returned to Him? Of course. What could be more obvious? We heap up a treasure of good in our heart through repeated decisions to deepen our communion with God. It is a great motive for us to love God, and love Him deeply, in that He has equipped us to participate in this kind of ever-deepening relationship with Him. We should make concrete resolutions concerning our own circumstances, how we are able to deepen our relationship through prayer, sacrifice and work.
II. This leads us to the second consideration. The Lord tells us that if we really hear His words and put them into practice, we will have to dig deep. This is, of course, another way of saying what He was saying above. It is not enough to simply hear His words when the Gospel readings are read in Church, even if we were to go to the church for every service, everyday. No, we cannot simply hear in this fashion. We have to dig deep. Digging deep means following the example of the Mother of God, which is given to us twice in the same Gospel. We have to ponder the Lord's ways in our hearts. We have to meditate on them. The very concept of meditation was inspired by watching ruminating animals. Ruminating animals have more than one stomach. They will, in the course of digestion, vomit the contents of their first stomach back up into their mouth, so that they can chew it again. Gross! Yes, but it is a useful image of what we are supposed to do with the Lord's words and His ways in our lives. We are supposed to meditate on them, that is to chew them over and over again. In them is life, just as life is in our food, but it takes some effort on our part to extract that life, just as a ruminating animal cannot simply swallow its food once and be done with it. If we have approached the spiritual life in that way in the past, we need to correct that. We can no longer read the Gospel and say, "OK, now I understand that. I'll move on to something else." Deepening communion with God results from continued meditation. We have to dig deep, and there, in communion with God, lay our foundation. We should certainly praise and thank God for the very invitation to "dig deep." After all, we realize that God did not have to reveal Himself at all. There is no necessity in any particular manifestation of His goodness. We can resolve in a concrete way to make "digging deep" a greater part of daily life.
III. So what can we expect if we don't dig deep. The Lord answers this by giving us the image of the person, who does not build on rock. What is the rock? His words? No, the rock is communion with God, that is, sharing the identity of God, becoming God by grace, since that which shares the same life is entitled to share the same name. If we hear His words and assume, "OK, I understand that. I can move on to something else," then we have not really heard Him. We may think that we are faithful, even daily communicants, but our whole life in religion is vitiated by the lack of mental prayer. Mental prayer, that is meditation, is that "digging deep" that we need in order to draw ever closer to God. If we are not drawing ever closer to God, we are getting further away from Him. There is no standing still in the spiritual life. We should stand in absolute awe of the goodness of a God, Who invites us so freely to communion with Him, Who wants us to share His life so fully. A resolution to expand the place that mental prayer holds in our life would be appropriate.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
St. Lucian of Antioch-- Building a Temple to the Lord from Virtues
With the splendour of the virtues thou madest thy soul a house for God, O Martyr Lucian; and by thy prayers thou didst raze the idols' temples to the ground.
Holy Martyr, Lucian, pray to God for us!
Compassed by trials and oppressed by painful tortures, O Martyr, thou dost praise as thy Benefactor Him that deemed thee worthy of such good things.
Holy Martyr Lucian, pray to God for us!
Thou didst surrender thy body unto tortures, O Martyr, but thou keptest thy soul in safety offering thyself unto the Master as an unblemished and most precious sacrifice. (October Menaion, 15)
This ode of the canon of the saint shows us an illustration of our contribution to our salvation. It is true that we are saved by faith in Christ, but we are also saved through the works done in faith, which "fill up what is wanting in the sufferings of Christ on behalf of His Body, the Church." We contribute to the great work of our salvation through works that are done in Christ. According to the image that is provided in the canon, we are building our soul into a beautiful temple for the Lord, by using the virtues as our raw material. We have to be expert carpenters and masons as we fit together the beautiful virtues into a dwelling that is holy in the Lord. This tropar of the canon makes us think explicitly of the Book of Proverbs (9:1): "Wisdom has built her house and made seven columns for it." Traditionally, the Fathers of the Church have interpreted this verse to refer to the seven virtues that are the support and basis of the Christian life (the three theological virtues: faith, hope and charity; and the four cardinal virtues: prudence, justice, fortitude and temperance). The Christian life is made up of virtue. On the one hand, we love virtue as we see it in the Lord and in others around us, but on the other hand, we pray for the grace to build the corresponding virtues in ourselves. At the same time that we are building, we are also tearing down the diabolical temples that we raise up within ourselves as a result of our attachments. We make created things into gods through our attachments to created things. Through the destruction of the passions, we tear those idolatrous temples down, as we build the virtuous temple to the Lord.
The second tropar is far more explicit about the particulars of this process. We accept the mortifications that are sent to us by God. We view as our benefactor the one who gives us trials and sufferings, because we know by the eyes of faith that He gives us these things in order to perfect us in the image and likeness of God. Praising God as our Benefactor means accepting what the Will of God gives to us in every circumstance. Despite the terrible sufferings that we may endure, we accept the direction of God's Will as holy, that is, separated from all earthly concerns, and impartial in its application, though, at the same time, completely motivated by unconditional compassion for each creature as if it were the only creature. We accept that that which befalls us is the best that could happen to us, not given our limited knowledge of the ways of universe, but according to the infinite knowledge and power of the Maker of the universe, who understands all its ways, and directs all its ways according to His own boundless love. It is a leap of faith, but not without reason, for it is eminently reasonable that God loves what He has made and what He continuously sustains in being.
The third tropar tells us that St. Lucian willed to become a unblemished sacrifice to God by giving his body over to torture. It goes on to say that it is precisely in giving his body over to torments that he keeps his soul safe for everlasting life. In the same way, we recognize that by willing embracing the mortifications and sufferings that God sends to us, we keep our souls safe through cooperation with God's Will. All of this leads us to a greater love for our God, Who has designed everything to work together for the good of those who love Him.
Monday, October 28, 2013
The Love of Benevolence as the Likeness of God
First we are invited by the the words of the Gospel to consider the general love of benevolence. We should have the love of benevolence for every creature. The love of benevolence is the continuous intellectual decision to will the good for the other. This is the perfect love that we are commanded to have for God and neighbour. The love of benevolence mirrors God's love. It is God's love returned to Him in a synergy. St. Isaac the Syrian tells us:
Once an elder was asked, "What is a merciful heart?" He replied, "It is the heart's burning for the sake of the entire creation, for men, for birds, for animals, for demons, and for every created thing; and at the recollection and sight of them, the eyes of a merciful man pour forth abundant tears. From the strong and vehement mercy that grips his heart and from his great compassion, his heart is humbled and he cannot bear to hear or to see any injury or slight sorrow in creation. For this reason he offers up prayers with tears continually even for irrational beasts, for the enemies of the truth, and for those who harm him, that they be protected and receive mercy. And in like manner he even prays for the family of the reptiles, because the great compassion that burns without measure in his heart is the likeness of God."(Homily 71)
The love of benevolence is the general orientation towards all things that makes us Godlike. For God is not a God who rules OVER all things like a taskmaster. He is not the sinister and intimidating Allah of Islam, who delights in the destruction of the things he has made. He is the compassionate Ruler of all Creation in the sense that He is the basis and foundation of everything that exists. He does not rule OVER all things, but supports all things, seeking the lowest place, so as to be and become the ground of all things.
Though the love of benevolence is the beginning and the sine qua non of becoming like God, the Lord Jesus goes on to say that we must do good in order to be like God. We must do concrete works. It is not enough to bear universal benevolence in our hearts. We must do deeds that manifest the benevolence of God. They needn't be enormous things of great moment. They merely need to be works of love done specifically for those who are normally outside of our circle of benevolence. Reaching beyond our circle of benevolence is essential to understanding the Lord's words. It also plays an essential part in his next remark.
He next tells us that we must "lend," but that we must not lend according to the world's way of lending. It does not take very long to come to the conclusion that when He says "lend," He is actually inviting us to give in a sacrificial way. This is the only possible way to interpret his instructions to lend, expecting nothing in return. Lending, but expecting nothing in return, is not technically lending. It is giving, donating in a sacrificial way. It is selflessly sacrificing that which we have a right to.
The Lord directs us in this passage to form within us the love of benevolence for every creature, to do specific works of kindness to those who are normally outside our circle of benevolence, and to do those acts in a selfless and sacrificial way. We can form specific resolutions now to make these three aims a part of our daily life. First, we can resolve to pray with a greater awareness of the love of benevolence. Second, we can make a specific resolution to deliberately reach, in a personal way, beyond our usual circle of benevolence to embrace someone in need, whom we know slightly, do not know, or is one of our enemies. Further, we can resolve to do these things in a truly sacrificial way, so that our entire beings are involved in the love that makes us like God.
Monday, September 9, 2013
11th Sunday After Pentecost-- Seek the Lord, while He may be found
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
The graces of true vocation
The disciple will inherit a hundredfold-- and persecution besides
The Life-Giving River of Prayer and Sacrifice
God has promised us a universal and everlasting Kingdom
Some reflections on the Gospel of the Man Born Blind
Monday, June 3, 2013
Reflecting On Thought: Part II
When we say the "mind" we mean, of course, the soul of man. This is not to suggest that the mind is all that there is to the soul. Actually, far from it. According to traditional Scholastic philosophy, for example, the mind (intellect) is numbered among the three high faculties of the soul along with Will and Memory. This is also not to suggest that if one "loses one's mind" then one has lost one's soul. The expression "to lose one's mind" really has nothing at all to do with the mind. It means that one has lost the ability to think rationally. Again, it is an assessment of thought and the powers of thought, not of the mind.
For all of the aforementioned reasons, some branches of Eastern philosophy, most notably Buddhism, rejects the reality of the self altogether. This does not mean that followers of this way of thinking reject identity or the reality of the individual, but only that they realize that there is nothing essentially that they can point to, which is constitutive of the self. According to their way of thinking, the self is not so a thing, but a process, like a river. We call South America's largest river the Amazon. We give it an identity, even though that which constitutes it is constantly changing, never the same. In the same way, the self is constantly changing and never the same, as can be observed by the "river of thought" of flows through it.
Christianity, though embracing realism as a philosophical basis for practical purposes, recognizes that contingent beings are not real in the sense that Being (God) is real. This is the very reason why St. Dionysius the Areopagite makes the rather shocking statement that it is just as true to say that God is not as it is to say that God is. It is not that the God Being is simply many, many degrees greater than ours. No, it is "Being" in an entirely different sense. The only way that we understand being in this world is through the mechanism of cause and effect. Every being is a cause, and every being is an effect. We cannot conceive of being aside from these relationships, so we use language that suggests these relationships even in reference to God.
The Sunday of the Samaritan Woman: The Human Being is Made to Be a Deep Well and a Life-Giving Spring
Monday, May 13, 2013
Reflecting on Thought: Part I
In the past I have spent some time reflecting on the problem that thought presents in the spiritual life. It is a common problem presented in all the spiritual writers and Fathers of the Church from the Cappadocians to the ascetical fathers of Sinai. Thought is such a problem because, according to the beliefs of the fathers, of it propensity to be demon-controlled. It is an even more common perception among the spiritual traditions across religious lines that it is difficult for us human beings to distinguish between thought and what should be the background of thought—the mind. We have all experienced it, the mind is never empty but jumps from thought to thought without pause. One thought leads to another thought, in a seamless way, so that often we wonder how we got to a particular thought that we, eventually, advert to. These end to end seamless series of thoughts are, more often than not, not apparent to us. The background noise of the mind is the "normal" that we are used to.
As we have seen before, St. John Climacus and the other ascetical fathers of Sinai advocated a type of concentration/awareness that allowed them to discern the difference between individual thoughts, watch them come and go, and be detached from them so as to effectively accept or reject them. Climacus called this discipline "going up into the tower." The image is of the owner of a vineyard, who is aware that the vineyard is under attack, so he withdraws into the tower in order to observe his enemies approaching. This concentration/awareness of thought in Climacus is not yet prayer, but in Climacus and in the Sinaite school in general, it is closely associated with the practice of the Jesus Prayer (the Prayer of the Heart), and may have been practiced simultaneously, or successively.
Across spiritual traditions, there is a concern about thought being automatic and uncontrolled. In contemporary life, we often hear in common speech the results of this type of automation. We hear the expression, for example, "He made me so angry." The implication is that thought is an irresistible force, like a locomotive on train tracks, which inevitably reaches its goal once it starts long its path. In this example, the subject was not capable of discerning the difference between the thoughts (and their attached passion: anger) and the mind, which is supposed to be the observer and arbiter of thought. Rather than observing the presence of anger, and then simply letting it go, the mind allows itself to be carried along by the runaway locomotive.
We are using here the name "mind" as the background, the observer and arbiter of thought. Buddhism, of course, promotes a belief that is referred to as "the theory of No-Mind." In Buddhism, the mind is said not to exist, not because Buddhism believes that thought has no arbiter/observer, but because nothing can be said or known about this arbiter/observer. This is, of course, true. There is nothing at all that can be known or said about the arbiter and observer of thought (the mind) in itself. It is completely ineffable on account of the fact that any knowledge or statement concerning it would have to proceed by means of thought. This very ineffability has very deep implications, and it is that that I will take up next.
Friday, March 29, 2013
The Nature of Silence
The Lord stands before Pilate. The Lord stands before His accusers in the Sanhedrin. The Lord stands before Herod. He is silent. "Like a lamb before his shearers, he was silent and opened not his mouth." Yes, indeed, the closest thing to this silence that we experience in this world is the silence of nature. It is a silence without hostility, nor sorrow. It is a silence full of love. Or, for that very silence, is not "peace" a better word. The forest is alive with the sounds of singing birds, along with the sound of the wind as it moves through the thick canopy. Yet none of those songs or gusts breaks the silence. No, rather, they are part of the silence, this special silence that attests to the truth of being. I count it as one of the greatest gifts that I learned to love this silence. From an early age, I can recall feeling at one with it. My own sounds too were part of it—treading a hiking path through a pine forest, with the sound of the cones crunching beneath my feet. Man is not alien to the silence of nature (the truth of being). No, he can even be part of it, if God wills. Sound does not break the silence. It is part of it. The only thing that would shatter the silence is the presence of untruth. Falsehood would shatter the silence. God has given me the privilege of being a part of the truth of being. I am also the only one who can dash it in pieces and tread it underfoot like the pine cones. It is my awesome, and fatal, choice.
The silence of nature is the mother of prayer. What could be more natural than union with God? Yes, it is supernatural, but nature was made for super-nature. Our great teacher is experience, in this matter, as in so many others. When we remove from our hearts everything that breaks the silence, all those things that shatter the truth of being, then we are open to God. We recognize the beauty of nature, this truth of being, and at the same time we recognize the defect of our own nature. Being in silence, without hostility and sorrow, reveals to us clearly the damage within us. In my distant memories, I recall that silence was a punishment. It was banishment—being set apart for having been bad. It was an agony and an eternity, even five minutes of such exile. Yet, these little childish banishments taught me nothing of silence. They taught me to be quiet. Only if we are quiet can we hear the silence.
This is all so much nonsense, then! These words mean nothing. What can "silence" mean if it includes sound? No, no, it is simple. Silence is what is natural. It is truth.
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Silence of Several Kinds
When the Lord stands before Pilate, He is silent. But what kind of a silence is this. Silence, we know from experience, differs according to kind.
There is the silence of bitter hostility--the silence of adversaries, who hold their peace lest, if they were to speak, they would come to blows. When this kind of silence envelopes a household, love can no longer live there, for there is no room. No, the silence fills every corner, every crack in the flooring, and every angle of every eave. Love needs room, and this silence gives it none. It is not silence by nature, but din. It may be silent, but it will eventually burst into sound. It is pressure longing for release. Given time, it will explode.
I have some experience with this silence. As a child, it was not much present in my house—save but from time to time, but I knew households of friends upon which it had settled like a wet blanket. They were kingdoms of blame, where expectations were never met, and needs were daily disregarded.
This was not the silence of the Lord Jesus before Pilate. No, that silence is "the still, small voice." You know the one—manifest not in fire, nor wind, nor the shaking of the earth.
It is not the silence of sorrow. That is a silence that would speak, but, somehow, can never find the words. It is not a silence, like that hostile silence, which is waiting to break into sound. No, it retreats further and further away from expression, until it sinks to the lowest point of despair. Despair no longer wants to speak. It is grievance that no longer wants to be heard. It wants only to sit alone, neglected and disregarded.
So, what is this silence before Pilate? What is this still, small voice? It is the silence of God. The closest thing we have to it in our experience is the silence of nature, for nature has learned it from her Master. Anyone who has walked in the forest has heard it. Anyone who has lain in the warm sunshine on a beach has experienced it. It is the presence of truth. It is a silence that is full of love. It is also full of meaning. No one can doubt its meaning, because no one can escape its peace.
Friday, March 8, 2013
Christ's Compassion Visits Us in our Far Country
Sunday, February 24, 2013
True Repentance: A Simple Message for us on the Sunday of the Pharisee and the Publican
Saturday, February 23, 2013
Reflections on this society's perception of the Catholic clergy as pedophiles and sexual deviants-- What have we to do with the world?
The answer to that question has to be "no," and not for any reasons of bitterness or hatred, but because caring about what the world thinks is going to make the problem worse, not better. The Prophet David was certainly right when he calls out: "Let the nations rage-- those who boast of their worthless gods." Secularists want something completely different out of life and existence than we do. Their desires appear to us as vanity. We have warned them that their values are vacuous, but they regard us as discredited and ridiculous. We have warned them, but they have not heard us. It is time to let them go their way, and follow the example of the Lord Jesus. "When He was insulted, He returned no insult. When He was made to suffer, He did not counter with threats, but gave Himself up to the one who judged Him unjustly." This is a fascinating verse, since in some versions it ends with "He gave Himself up to the One Who judged Him justly." The latter reading is referring to the Father, while the former is referring to the Sanhedrin, the High Priest Caiaphas and Pontius Pilate. Whatever version you like, the truth remains the same. In order to give yourself up the One Who will judge you justly (God), you have to give yourself up to the one who judges you unjustly (the Pilates of your life). So, let them think what they like. It is, after all, they who hate. We hate no one.
But here is a further nagging question: How can we be effective witnesses to truth, if we are perceived as sexual deviants, discredited, and evil? The only possible answer to that question is: We can't. We can't effectively witness to truth. The best thing to do is to admit it, accept it and get on with the task at hand. If we try to continue to preach the truth to the secular society, we will only bring ridicule on the truth itself. I remember well the touching story of the Clown of God, an Italian folktale that was retold and illustrated by Tomie da Paola some years ago. The clown grows to great fame on account of his ability to juggle, eventually building an act in which he juggles many different things, drawing large crowds all over the country. But he grows old and people become tired of his displays, and, eventually, he even begins to drop things. In the end, he is ridiculed, hated and even forcibly driven from town after town. In his old age, he is penniless. In the end, he is attracted to a church where the feast of the Nativity of the Lord is being celebrated. He enters the church and witnesses the glory of the festive celebration. After the service is ended, he conceives a great desire in his heart to offer something to the newborn Lord. He wishes he had something to give. He decides to juggle one last time before the altar. He gives his whole heart to the performance for the Lord, and during the high point of the act, he suddenly dies, collapsing before the altar. Some Franciscan friars find him there, and, to their astonishment, they find the statue of the Lord Jesus over the altar holding the golden ball that was centerpiece of the clown's act. Faced with the ultimate failure of his life, the clown found success in prayer. In the same way, we have to change our priorities, put all our energy into interiority, and become people of prayer. Similarly in the time of Noah, the world heard Noah's warnings and denunciations, but at a certain point, Noah had to enter the ark and seal it.
When we really think about it, this is not a big change. We are no longer going to be esteemed in this society. Quite the opposite, we are going to be despised as sexual deviants. But our ancestors were thought by secular society to be sexual deviants, too. The early Christian community was widely labeled as miscreants because of their supposed practice of incest and cannibalism. Many centuries later, the Catholic clergy here in the United States were despised again for similar reasons, when falsehoods were printed and widely disseminated in such publications as The Awful Disclosures of Maria Monk in the Hotel-Dieu de Montreal and its sequels. Ultimately, the libelous books were proven to be lies, but a generation of non-Catholics believed them. We are no longer going to be esteemed in this society, but that gives us an opportunity to be further conformed to Christ: "Who would believe what we have heard? To whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed? He grew up like a sapling before him, like a shoot from the parched earth; there was in him no stately bearing to make us look at him, no appearance that would attract us to him. He was despised and rejected by men, a man of suffering, accustomed to infirmity, one of those from whom men turn away, and we held him in no esteem."
We have to become intent on prayer. Our Christianity by necessity must be less preachy and more prayerful. Our Year of Faith, which was proclaimed by Benedict XVI, the Pope of Rome, is a perfect opportunity for us to do accomplish this.
Monday, January 28, 2013
Your Faith Has Saved You: Some thoughts about reading the Scriptures in a personal manner
Brothers and sisters in Christ—
We had this same Gospel reading a few weeks ago, but today we find more than enough that is new in the reading to meditate on. The last line of the reading is particularly interesting. The Lord tells the leper, who had been healed, "Go, your faith has saved you." It is more accurate to translate, "Go, the faith that is yours has saved you," but this is awkward, so we do not translate it this way typically. However, we should be cognizant of the difference. It is not merely by some abstract faith that we are saved. It is not sufficient that we simply profess faith in Christ, as if, as long as we do that, we can sit at home, without the Church, without the sacraments, without prayer, without the comprehensive practice of religion. No, on the contrary, the faith (the Catholic Faith) has saved us, and is saving us. When the Lord tells the man in the Gospel that his faith had saved him, He did not mean that the man never had to think about his salvation ever again. He did not mean that it was impossible for the man to contract the disease of leprosy again. No, He meant that the faith (faith in Christ) had saved the man right then, at that moment.
Salvation is a story, a history, not a one-time event. If we were to believe that salvation was an event, once for all, we would be incapable of understanding the Holy Scriptures. The Scriptures are a continuous series of falls into sin, and redemptions from sin through God's love. Again and again, God's people fall away from God. God then punishes His people to correct them, and bring them back to the right way. The people turn to God. God heals them and receives them back into His friendship. Progressively, in the course of all these episodes, the people's knowledge of the ways of God deepens, so that the next fall is of a different nature, or in a matter less grave.
The experience of being saved by our faith is learning to live the history of salvation as our personal history. It is learning to read the Scriptures as if they are about God's dealings with us. The infidelities that are denounced there are our infidelities. The punishments that are described there are our chastisements, which are intended by God to gently bring us back to our relationship with God. When we read the Scriptures, God wants us to understand that we are His chosen one. Each and every one of us is His beloved, whom He desires to bring to Himself.
The fathers have told us that ignorance of the Scriptures is ignorance of Christ. But ignorance of the Scriptures is also ignorance of our relationship to God. We should try to read the Scriptures in this kind of personal way, which will lead us to pray about the text. We are used to reading for information. We should not read the Bible primarily for information. We should read as an entry to prayer, using the Scriptures to begin that dialogue with God that prayer should be. Let the words give birth within us to thoughts and resolutions that relate to our circumstances, so that, through the text, God can reveal to us the sins we must destroy and the virtues we must cultivate with His help. Then, at every moment, God can say to us in our prayer, "Your faith has saved you."
Saturday, January 26, 2013
My Maimonides: Notes in the Margin of the Guide for the Perplexed
Maimonides is very insistent that it is the tradition in Judaism that Metaphysics is superior to Physics, and that metaphysical issues and questions hold pride of place over those that are concerned with the origin and construction of the physical world. At the same time, however, the rabbis are equally insistent that the Description of the Chariot should not be taught to any student, who has not mastered the Description of the Creation. Further, the student must have distinguished himself by certain intellectual qualities before being initiated into the mysteries of metaphysics. Both are necessary, but Physics is the only door of Metaphysics, while the purpose of Physics is the discovery (in the original sense of the word) of Metaphysics.
What makes this perspective so important is the fact that this culture has effectively excluded Metaphysics as an area of possible knowledge. In today's world, learning about the world (particularly in the modern sciences) leads nowhere but further into the physical world. Pure science is knowledge for knowledge's sake about the physical world that emphatically does not lead to something greater, something deeper, but constitutes an end in itself. Gone is the spirit of Aristotle himself, a spirit that, seeing the world of change described by physical science, longed to ascend above the realm of physical science to that that did not change. Maimonides would certainly look upon modern science as a truncated knowledge. He would see it as a form of physical science that was obsessed with itself
In the modern world, our culture has become satisfied with the official separation of Physics and Metaphysics. Much like the "separation of church and state" it has become a dogma as unbending as any geometric law. Physics and Metaphysics are discreet areas, which are explored by different people. Increasingly, those whose purview is the physical sciences refuse to even so much as acknowledge the possibility of the existence of anything beyond their field, claiming that the only things that are real are those that can be known empirically through sense perception.
Yet, at the same time that Metaphysics has been discarded, another interesting and counterintuitive thing is happening on the level of culture. One would think that with this emphasis on empirical knowledge and evidence there would be a growth in the use of reason and in rational argument as a means to arrive at the truth. Actually, however, the opposite is the case. As the physical sciences gain complete sway over everything else as the exclusive arbiters of meaning, there is a steady diminution of the ability of our contemporaries to use logic in order to frame rational arguments. More often than not, they will afford themselves of sentimentalism, arguments based on emotions, and, if these fail to be convincing to their interlocuters, they will resort to ad hominems. This can be clearly seen in political discourse, where the Left and the Right revile one another with invective and insult, but rational argument is nowhere to be found.
The disappearance of rational argument in modern discourse might easily be considered related to the disappearance of Metaphysics. The physical sciences are deemed an end in themselves, and not as a stepping stone to the greater realities that lie beyond the physical universe. Reason itself, beyond the laboratory quantifications associated with the scientific method, is not considered terribly useful, After all, "nature is red in tooth and claw." If the physical universe is all that exists, then there is no truth beyond what can be ascertained by physical science. There are the truths of mathematics. There is quantity, weight, duration, etc. There is no virtue, no good. Further, while there is in the physical sciences an intricate description of forces, there is no concept of Being, and no truth of Being.
Friday, January 25, 2013
An Unexpected Book Recommendation: Scripture Commentary is a Philosophic Feast
The commentary that they sent me to start with is the volume on St. Paul's Letter to the Romans. I confess, there is a great deal of editorial comment concerning "justification by faith alone," which we know for certain is not a component of Christian Faith known to the Fathers of the Church. On the contrary, the Fathers understood the Faith the same way that historical Christians understand it now; that is, that our salvation is achieved through the sacramental system instituted by Christ. Christ is not Buddha (He did not come to be an ethical teacher. He came to institute life-giving mysteries.)Besides this, however, the insights that are provided by the various selected Fathers (saints of the Early Church) more than make up for having to wade through the occasional anachronistic Lutheran-based diatribe in defense of sola fides. It will be interesting to see what the volume on the Gospel of St. John will do with the passages regarding the Eucharist, since, it is undeniable, that all of the Fathers believed in sacramental realism as far as the Eucharist is concerned.
The coordinators of the ACCS project state that what they want to do is assemble a "Christian Talmud," which will proceed through the various Scriptural books verse by verse giving explanatory commentary. The same coordinators also state that they are desiring to produce a book that can and will be used by Christians of all sorts (Protestants, Catholics and Orthodox).
I think that this is a very important project for Christian lay-people, especially, since it opens to them, really for the first time, the riches of the Patristic Age. Christianity in the Patristic Age is really philosophy in its most undiluted form, since the Fathers of the Church were, for the most part, highly trained in the Greco-Roman philosophy of their day, but, over and above that, they were deeply in love with the Divine Wisdom Himself, Who had become incarnate for our sake.
Nobody has a greater appreciation for Who Christ Is than the Fathers. They understood in a very real sense that He is the Logos (the pattern, the model, the principle of comprehensibility for everything in Creation and for the whole of Being). Each of them had a personal love for Jesus Christ, but that love was cosmic in that they recognized that the Logos is what stands behind the logoi of everything that exists. To learn about the Logos, study the logoi, they would say, for the Logos Himself engenders the logoi. Each of the logoi participates in the Logos. The challenge that presented itself to each of the Fathers as they got out of bed every morning was how to live their lives kata Logon (according to the Logos), which is the same as to say "according to Wisdom," or "according to Reason."
This commentary series is definitely worth a read. I think it has the potential to bring a lot of people, of various Christian backgrounds, to an appreciate of true philosophy.

